A discussion on replacing the Fire and Emergency Levy with a Community Protection Levy to fund climate resilience projects and improve community safety through proactive investment rather than reactive emergency responses.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
There's a call to scrap fire and emergency levy that we all pay through our insurance and instead use the money to improve the country's climate resilience. The calls come from Chris Farfuay, who's the insurance council CEO. Morning, Faf. Good morning, Heather. How much is this going to free up? About six to seven hundred million dollars?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
widely planned but underfunded in high-risk regions
Kris Faafoi: Insurance Council CEO on the call to replace the Fire and Emergency Levy with a Community Protection LevySpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
