This piece examines the evolution of legal realism in law schools, tracing how a modest empirical claim about judicial choice has been radicalized into a post-modern critique that undermines judicial legitimacy and the rule of law, while defending the inherent values of thecommon
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.