This piece argues that legal categories are not neutral but reflect human biases, using the introduction of a specific non-fatal strangulation offence in New Zealand as a case study to show how naming violence can shift recognition and institutional response, while highlighting局限
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 1 article from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
a powerful tool that changes how violence is recognised and responded to
The law isn’t neutral, and it never has beenalarm over rising rates among young people
Sexual assault clinics raise alarm about ‘worrying’ strangulation rates in under-25sSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
