Auckland University law expert Joshua Yuvaraj discusses growing global concerns about AI-generated hallucinations in court filings, highlighting risks to legal accuracy, judicial trust, and the integrity of justice systems, with implications for both self-represented litigantsand
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Well, uh yes, yes and no. Uh for for lawyers, we have a duty to uh be completely candid with uh with the court. And so uh the the whole system is built on judges being able to trust what uh what lawyers say. Uh that there's a reason you are able to go to a lawyer to sign an affidavit or take a statutory declaration, because there's a position of trust in society. Uh but um but if you can't do that, then again, the the whole sort of system, you know, threatens to break down a little bit. Uh and and I guess with litigants as well, the whole scheme of litigation depends on the judge being able to trust that people who are in litigation are telling the truth or are presenting things accurately.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
central to maintaining judicial confidence
Joshua Yuvaraj: Auckland University law expert on the concerns raised over AI-related court filingsSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
