This piece argues that legal categories are not neutral but reflect human biases, using the introduction of a specific non-fatal strangulation offence in New Zealand as a case study to show how naming violence can shift recognition and institutional response, while highlighting局限
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
not neutral, reflecting the biases and choices of those who created it
The law isn’t neutral, and it never has beenSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.