OpenBrief
Log in Sign up
What the picker changes
  • Top topics digest — the cards score the selected period against the prior 4 weeks.
  • 12-week heatmap & outlet matrix — show the 12 weeks ending at the selected week (they slide back with the picker, they aren’t a fixed snapshot).
  • Per-topic volume / alias drift — same 12-week trailing window, anchored on the selected period.
  • Coverage gap quadrant — scores the selected period against the 12 weeks before it (not including it).
  • Anomaly cards — only show alerts the detector fired during the selected period. Quiet weeks legitimately show none.
What stays as-is
  • Outlet orientation strip / lean colours — context-only, drawn from the last 12 weeks of activity regardless.
  • Co-occurrence graph — recent-activity anchored, not picker-driven.
  • Source & topic profiles — all-time data for the topic; the picker doesn’t affect them.
Rolling 7 days is a sliding live window for “current vibes”; switch to Weekly to compare specific weeks side-by-side.
live window
Topic

Labour Party Policy Lack

11 items · 11 aliases · peaked week of 7 Jun 2026 · first seen 8 May 2026

The post criticizes Labour's lack of policy ideas compared to the Greens and Te Pati Māori, suggesting those parties would lead if elected.

Volume by source orientation Methodology →

Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.

Alias drift

How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.

Free account Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge. Create a free account Log in

In the press Methodology →

How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 2 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.

12-week press volume 2 articles
Free account Create a free account to see every headline on this topic — plus alerts when framing shifts or discourse and press diverge. Create a free account Log in

Heard on radio

Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.

  • Let me get this right. Just so we all know where we're at. The Labour Party, who I'm assuming still want to be taken seriously this election, have had a major issue up to this point, the issue being they have no policies. Even though a lot of us, and to be thanked, probably most of us, don't actually need the state to pay for a doctor's visit. Their other policy we sort of knew about was this future fund, and it would contain the SOEs whose dividends would go into creating jobs and growing the economy. So update now on the future fund. We aren't going to know about that until after the election. Good news is, of course, they're not actually winning the election, so it sort of doesn't matter. But they will make it even harder, I would have thought, to crack a winning uh chance at the election now, given that voters sort of want to know what stuff costs, especially large stuff. Further trouble is that the hold-up is they need advice, apparently. We were informed of this yesterday. That's right, bogged down yet again in Matters Māori. Originally they told us the SOEs involved were commercially sensitive. Now it's treaty troubles. Previously, Chris Hipkin said the fund would create jobs. Yesterday, Barbara Edmonds didn't know how many jobs, because that would depend on what the fund invested in and what SOEs were in the fund and what advice they got around the treaty obligation. So no job stats, no cost stats, no real detail on who's in, who isn't, on one of what they call their cornerstone policies. So no policies until there is a policy, but sort of a secret policy that if you vote for us, we'll tell you about it after the election. Small question at this point. Do they honestly believe one, we're that stupid, two, that this is any sort of way to conduct an election campaign, or three, this is any sort of excuse this close to an election. Actually, four, are they smarter than we think? And this is basically their white flag because they don't actually want to win the government anyway. Part of what haunts them, of course, from last time, is their inability to actually do anything apart from spray money. They talk, they don't do.
Free account Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language. Create a free account Log in

Sample framings

Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.

mike-hosking-breakfast Government / N-A

critical lack of detail on key policies

Mike's Minute: Labour's lack of detail show they've learned nothing
19 May
family-first Right

diversity gaps undermine public trust

Daybreak – 10 June 2026
9 Jun
Free account Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language. Create a free account Log in

How the public reacted

Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →

Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.