A political podcast discussion between National's Mark Mitchell and Labour's Ginny Andersen addresses MP housing entitlements, Labour's handling of audience questions, and allegations of media training or distraction tactics used during candidate selection events.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
I don't think we've kind of uh taken it to the highest level of the Labour Party. You know, of course we'd rather be talking about three-free visits to the GP uh or the state of education system and the forms now. But look, we though candidates responding to a light heart question as part of a QA session, and and that's just about as exciting as it gets.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
accuses party of using distraction tactics to avoid tough questions
Pollies: National's Mark Mitchell and Labour's Ginny Andersen talk MP housing entitlements, Labour leaksSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
