Topic
Labour Party Allegiance
28 items
· 7 aliases
· peaked week of 31 May 2026
· first seen 11 May 2026
The post critiques a political figure's inconsistency by pointing out that they criticized a person or party (boldger/labour) but later aligned with them, suggesting hypocrisy and lack of principled consistency.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
Free account
Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language.
Create a free account
Log in
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
20 social posts
·
1,921 engagement
Stance — 20 classified edges
Supportive
5
Critical
11
Neutral / explainer
2
Mocking
2
Sentiment — 20 classified posts
Positive
5
Neutral
2
Negative
13
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
twitter
· @winstonpeters
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 556
· ↻ 85
· 💬 47
· 867 engagement
29 May
-
twitter
· @williejlabour
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 468
· ↻ 39
· 💬 62
· 732 engagement
5 Jan
-
reddit
· u/Impressive-Name5129
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 81
· ↻ 0
· 💬 31
· 174 engagement
31 May
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.