Topic
Judicial Bias
9 items
· 6 aliases
· first seen 18 May 2026
A critical and sarcastic comment questioning transgender identity and suggesting judicial decisions are influenced by personal paraphilic tendencies.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
9 social posts
·
52 engagement
Stance — 9 classified edges
Critical
8
Mocking
1
Sentiment — 9 classified posts
Negative
9
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
twitter
· @bobmccoskrienz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 21
· ↻ 10
· 💬 0
· 41 engagement
19 May
-
youtube
· @UCgQmbBnHlweg1g3ifa086WA
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
12 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCo-a2IPUycP1LYj0HX-ZwEA
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 3
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 3 engagement
18 May
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.