Topic
John Campbell Qualifications
3 items
· 3 aliases
· first seen 15 Jun 2026
A sarcastic reply questioning the validity of John Campbell's academic credentials, framing them as a symbol of dishonesty in political discourse.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
3 social posts
·
38 engagement
Stance — 3 classified edges
Mocking
3
Sentiment — 3 classified posts
Positive
1
Negative
2
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
youtube
· @UC0gz06Vv4S8Rp8IOKxC_sfw
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 38
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 38 engagement
15 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCWkfwtcbgPaTobCblQfeusg
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
16 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCJmZF6hDiT7Lc8rAoxHBJMg
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
15 Jun
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.