A podcast discussion questions the fairness and value of Auckland's $3 million expenditure on Robbie Williams' concert, arguing it reflects mismanagement of the major events fund and poor public value compared to international pricing and demand.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Run your business like a well-oiled machine on NZ's most reliable mobile network. Search One New Zealand Business Mobile. Plans from $40 a month. Awarded by Umlauten 2025. Fair use in terms of play. Price excludes GST. One New Zealand. Let's get connected. Right, here's a question for you. How badly did we get ripped off if it's true that we paid $3 million to get Robbie Williams here? Now, we don't know for sure, for sure, that that is the amount of money that the government paid out of its major events fund, but that is what Maine Wayne Brown, the mayor of Auckland, has revealed today in a fit of peek at the government. And so far nobody's publicly denied it, not even Louise Upston, who's the minister in charge of the money. And privately, we at this show have had at least one what I would call soft confirmation that the amount is correct. Now, if that's true, three million dollars for, as Wayne Brown calls him, a tattooed palm, is a lot of money. And it's too much money. We're wasting taxpayer money here. For a start, as excited as I personally am to be going to Robbie's concert in November, I don't think a 90s pop star is what we imagined the major events fund would have been used for when it was set up. After we missed out on Taylor Swift and Oasis and Lady Gaga. I mean, two of two in that list are proper A-list stars, and one is a massively overdue reunion. Completely different league. Completely different league to Robbie. An offshore promoter told us $3 million is way too much to pay for Robbie. Singapore, this will put it in perspective for you. Singapore reportedly paid $3 million New Zealand for six Taylor Swift concerts two years ago. Now, if three million dollars buys you six Tay Tays, how did we end up blowing three million dollars on only one Robbie? We've been ripped off good and proper here, and the proof is in the fact that the tickets are apparently not selling very well at the moment. But then again, then again, bear this in mind, okay? Maybe this is what we just need to get used to and stop fighting it. Robbie and Lincoln Park may well be just the best that New Zealand can do now. Big stars like Lady Gaga and Oasis and Tay Tay and Harry Styles are going to go to Australia, not here, and they're going to expect us to come to them, and we will. I'm flying to Harry Styles. I flew to Oasis. Heaps of people flew to Tay Tay. That's how it works now. And if we're gonna want a former boy band member who peaked in the 90s to come to New Zealand, we are simply gonna have to pay a lot of money for him.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
Singapore's deals show NZ's pricing is unreasonable
Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: Is Auckland getting ripped off when it comes to concerts?Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.