The podcast discusses key economic and policy shifts affecting New Zealand farmers, including tax proposals, rising land prices, and the cancellation of a major inland rail project, highlighting concerns over rural economic sustainability and government prioritisation.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 1 article from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Yes, well I've been building this for some time. It's about 1600 kilometres long and the big attraction of this is that for a start you could have 1.8 kilometre long double stack train. Double stack means one container on top of the other. So you've got a 40 foot container on top of another 40 foot which you can't do on the coast because of all the tunnels and overhead wires and things over the tracks where it's going. But out there you could. So you've got farmers in Midwest. West New South Wales who could grow veggies and flowers and then get them up to the new World Camp airport at Toowoomba and fly them into Singapore within 48 hours. They have a whole new market that they would never have dreamed about, whereas the moment they've got to be trucked to Sydney and then got on a plane in Sydney, it's not nearly as feasible. So this was a really exciting project for farmers and of course the government now has said, well... It was supposed to cost $20 billion. It's now up to $30 billion with expected cost for another $40 billion, a lot of it because of the cost of some of the regulation and green tape and red tape involved in acquiring properties in Midwestern New South Wales going through national parks and state forests. And the government has just said, no, it looks too expensive. We're not going to do it anymore. They've got little bits of it built, but there are some key bits in the middle that aren't, which make the bits they built almost useless. They're not going to stop acquiring land because the National Party and the opposition has said that as soon as they get elected, they will immediately recommence it because they do have a real base in rural Australia. Whereas the Labour Party really don't have a base there, they don't get any votes there, they care about it really, and therefore it's in their interest to say, well let's save that money and put it in the NDIS or one of the other schemes that's their pet scheme.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
political retreat from rural economic development
The Country 07/05/26: Chris Russell talks to Jamie MackaySpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.