The process by which central and local government in New Zealand decide which infrastructure projects receive funding and in what order, encompassing assessments of value, capital allocation trade-offs, and the sequencing of major transport, utility, and civic investments.
How the framings classify across 8 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Up to 12 framings across outlets and orientations — each a short phrase the extractor generated to characterise the piece's editorial angle (not a quote). Filter by lean to see how each bloc is spinning the story; click through to read the original.
a failure to align projects with national needs
Democracy Briefing: The $56 billion broken promiseframed as nostalgic, emotional, and politically symbolic
From Eminem to Michael Jackson: watching the budget debateStacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 6 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Well, with ministers, that's exactly what ministers need when it comes to making investment decisions. I mean, I'm a minister of infrastructure and the cabinet sits there and we're asked …
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
