The piece criticizes Wellington City Council executives for withholding critical information from elected councillors, arguing that this undermines effective governance and calls for stronger information rights similar to those in the private sector.
How the framings classify across 3 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
I don't know that. I you know, we've got a we've got a report. It makes no recommendations, but it raises some very serious issues. Those issues are completely unacceptable and a disgrace in in the context of a public sector. I want them investigated. What flows from that remains to be seen.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
concern over covert messaging in coalition
Is the Luxon-Peters coalition running out of road?deliberate or systemic withholding of reports
Sir Brian Roche: Public Service Commissioner calls for investigation into MBIE border biometrics projectSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
