Auckland University law expert Joshua Yuvaraj discusses growing global concerns about AI-generated hallucinations in court filings, highlighting risks to legal accuracy, judicial trust, and the integrity of justice systems, with implications for both self-represented litigantsand
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Then you you risk the law developing based on you know uh false premises, and that can have real impacts uh on people if the law develops in a particular particular way. Say it takes away someone's employment rights or say it takes away someone's custodial rights or something like that. So we want justice to be done essentially.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
potentially damaging to rights and outcomes
Joshua Yuvaraj: Auckland University law expert on the concerns raised over AI-related court filingsSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
