A healthy food environment in New Zealand politics involves policies and debates around improving access to nutritious food and regulating unhealthy food, driven by concerns over obesity and health equity.
How the framings classify across 5 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Up to 12 framings across outlets and orientations — each a short phrase the extractor generated to characterise the piece's editorial angle (not a quote). Filter by lean to see how each bloc is spinning the story; click through to read the original.
supermarket cues and advertising trigger mental food associations
Craving something for dinner? Your mind may be ‘tasting’ food before you eat itremoval of junk food and liquor outlets as urgent
\\ \\ 14 December 2020\\ \\ Press Release\\ \\ **New Partnership For Greater Health Equity** \\ \\ Three organisations, The Helen Clark Foundation, Health Coalition Aotearoa, and the MAS Foundation, are delighted to announce a partnership that…\\ \\ H\\ \\ Helen Clark FoundationLobby groups, unions, think tanks and industry bodies whose own releases or whose people’s media appearances touched this topic over the last 12 months. Owned = their own press releases; earned = their people quoted across radio, press & commentary. A card carried in both — with the release coming first — is the agenda-setting signal. Co-occurrence isn’t proof a group drove the coverage.
removal of junk food and liquor outlets as urgent
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
