The post critiques the Greens' proposed wealth tax as unrealistic and disproportionate compared to global wealth tax practices, suggesting it amounts to fantasy rather than viable policy.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Well, yes, it's incredible, isn't it? That um, you know, 150 people um they've got about uh 27 billion, well, have had a 27 billion dollar increase in their wealth. Um, and um the greens are saying, well, you know, that increase has come at the uh cost of living crisis uh and the cost of they say it's actually a cost of greed when it comes to the wealthy. Um the Greens will announce their policy this week, and um they will fix the tax system, they say, to ensure the super rich contribute their fair share share to the society that they they say they profit from to rebuild a country that works for all of us and not just the rich. Well, typical um of the Greens said the Prime Minister this afternoon, uh Chris Luxon says the wealth tax, the Greens are advocating, would see an outflow of success and capital from this country.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
criticised as economically damaging and harmful to growth
Barry Soper: Newstalk ZB senior political correspondent on what the Middle East peace deal could mean for Kiwi fuel pricesdevastating impact on average dairy farms
NEW REPORT: Labour Coalition would put family farms in the firing lineSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
