The podcast critiques the government's plan to cut up to 10,000 public sector jobs, arguing it is based on flawed, outdated figures and disproportionately harms essential services amid population growth and climate challenges, while highlighting a broader pattern of prioritizing稅
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Oh, there's so much here. Uh look, the historic the austerity isn't working, so the best way to get through the austerity is to austerity even harder. Um, and that's absolutely what I think we see here. I think um the media has really dropped the ball here. Um almost breathlessly repeating that jobs lost equal big savings.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
a backward-looking, politically motivated justification
#BHN NZPSA National Secretary Duane Leo on the government cutting of 10,000 public sector jobsSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
