A YouTube post by @theplatformnz challenges the validity of climate change science, frames government legislative cuts as sensible, and questions the credibility of IPCC predictions and environmental litigation pressures.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
That's the thing. They cut like two thousand people. Wellington's problem's not a c cutting problem. But Oscar, I mean, to your point, you're you're quite right. It always is the case that these cuts happen when it is toughest for people out there. But that's because the government books are so bad. It's the only time we ever make cuts. When else would we make cuts? We're not going to make cuts when there's heaps of money, are we?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
undermines accountability for māori children
Release: National’s cuts devastating for vulnerable childrenopaque and poorly communicated decisions
#regional: Taranaki’s Clean Energy Future Dealt Blow as Government Axes Ara Ake FundingSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
