A Labour Party release calls for transparency into the government's boot camp pilot, criticizing the lack of data on reoffending and the withholding of information by ministers, suggesting the initiative is politically motivated rather than evidence-based.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 4 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
NZI Insurance. Peace of mind for New Zealand business. Let today be a warning to public servants considering trying to get one over Erica Stanford that they may want to rethink that approach and play with a straight bat instead. Because Erica Stanford is not one to be trifled with. She has today thrown her officials, uh her immigration officials in particular, under the bus, by revealing that they wasted more than $30 million on a biometrics data system that never actually happened. What's worse, though, than wasting taxpayer money is the dark arts that they practiced and trying to hide what was going on. They withheld information from ministers, they deliberately fudged numbers to keep the project cost down, and then under the amount that would require it to go to cabinet for spending sign off. They removed people from the project if those people raised concerns about it. And there was plenty to raise concern about. There were cost overruns, there were delays in the go live date, there were problems with what this tech upgrade could actually do. Now we do have to acknowledge that these are Erica Stanford's allegations and the allegations that are laid out in a report that she has made public today. We haven't heard and we probably will never hear an official response denying anything of what she said. But this is believable, isn't it? The idea that public servants try to hide things from their things from their ministers and frustrate what the elected government might want to do. It is believable because we see it around the world. It is a huge problem over in the UK in what they call the blob, their public service. And we've seen it here. We've seen it playing out over the last two and a half years in particular, most notably when the government made it clear that race-based uh treatment, special treatment was to stop.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
deliberate suppression of project truths
Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: Don't trifle with Erica StanfordSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.