The article explains that the New Zealand-India Free Trade Agreement includes a $20 billion FDI promotion target, clarifying it is not a taxpayer-funded commitment but a policy framework for trade missions and market access support.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
I suspect it's reality, and I mean, maybe I'm being generous, but Damien O'Connor, Labour's Trade Spokesperson, he, you know, was involved in negotiating this deal when Labour was in government. Labour's concern is that under the deal, New Zealand would commit to promoting $34 billion of investment in India over 15 years. Now, that is an extraordinary sum of money. There is no way. A, businesses in New Zealand are going to put $34 billion into India over 15 years. Like, we're simply not going to be able to meet that target. Labour's concern is that the agreement says that, you know, if we don't promote, so not meet the target, but promote that target, India could come back after 15 years and claw back some of the benefits New Zealand received. So Labour's saying, well, there's a real risk actually here for businesses. going into do business with India you know if there's a risk that after 15 years the Indians go oh actually you didn't you didn't uphold your end of the stick around this investment thing and now we're clawing it back
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.