A critical commentary on the Fisheries Amendment Bill, which grants sweeping secrecy protections to fishing industry camera footage, accusing it of enabling regulatory capture, suppressing accountability, and undermining transparency and democratic rights.
How the framings classify across 3 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
commercial sensitivity justifies information limits
Ombudsman flags Bill of Rights concern over cameras on boats blackoutSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
