The government's energy plan is criticized for favoring fossil fuels and lacking clear, evidence-based solutions, potentially leading to dirtier and more expensive power.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Well, I think um yeah, it's clear that we need real um real incentives to to properly react. The thing about the the energy markets is that the incentive is to only provide exactly how much that you you need. And if you provide um, so that puts it right on a nice edge, but but this is saying, well, actually, you know, if you get that wrong, there's a ten million dollar um hit. And I I think that's that's logical and it's gonna change the dynamics about how they consider this.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
financial penalty drives better backup planning
Andrew Eagles: Smart Energy Alliance Spokesperson on the Govt pushing ahead with an LNG import terminal, scraps proposed levySpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
