The Free Speech Union opposes the granting of name suppression in a case involving a man who filmed a sex worker with smart glasses, arguing that potential job loss does not meet the legal threshold for 'extreme hardship' and that open justice must prevail.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
rigid legal standard challenged in practice
Open Justice Demands Smart Glasses Voyeur Should Not Get Name SuppressionSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.