The podcast highlights Wellington City Council's secret exemption of 42% of high-earning staff from a government law on personal grievance rights, raising concerns about transparency, accountability, and public trust in local governance.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Now, I would have thought that after all that publicity that Wellington City Council's been getting and the paid staff have been getting for being busted doing things behind the backs of the elected councillors, they probably, possibly wouldn't do it again. And yet, here we are. They've been busted doing it again. So the latest revelation is that they have decided to exempt themselves from a government law that was brought in about three months ago that stops employees who earn more than $200,000. dollars from taking personal grievance cases against their bosses if their bosses fire them as in there will be no golden handshake if you've been sacked and you're earning that much money but guess what Wellington City Council bosses decided they weren't going to do that and they exempted 42% 42 of their staff from this particular law which is kind of unbelievable because this law is supposed to make it easier for bosses to fire incompetent managers who are doing much doing nothing much for years on end in their jobs and Wellington City City Council knows that they have, according to a recent report, possibly a couple of hundred staff that they need to get rid of. They have one of the highest levels of staffing in the country when you compare them with other councils. Each household in Wellington is paying for 19 full-time equivalent staff. Upper Hutt, just up the road, they're only supporting 10 staff. Wellington City Council, 19 staff. As I say, they didn't tell the elected councillors that they'd taken this decision. But a councillor found out about it, started asking questions, turns out it was true. Technically, the council can say they didn't have to tell the elected councillors this, this is an employment decision, they can make it by themselves. But even the mayor, Andrew Little, has said this should have come to the council to sign off, it's not a good look. It is becoming a bit of a running theme, isn't it? Not just in Wellington, but around the country. Unelected staff making decisions in secret that ratepayers probably wouldn't love if they knew about it.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
unfair protection for high-earning staff
Perspective with Heather du Plessis-Allan: Wellington Council's been caught keeping secrets from ratepayers againSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
