OpenBrief
Log in Sign up
What the picker changes
  • Top topics digest — the cards score the selected period against the prior 4 weeks.
  • 12-week heatmap & outlet matrix — show the 12 weeks ending at the selected week (they slide back with the picker, they aren’t a fixed snapshot).
  • Per-topic volume / alias drift — same 12-week trailing window, anchored on the selected period.
  • Coverage gap quadrant — scores the selected period against the 12 weeks before it (not including it).
  • Anomaly cards — only show alerts the detector fired during the selected period. Quiet weeks legitimately show none.
What stays as-is
  • Outlet orientation strip / lean colours — context-only, drawn from the last 12 weeks of activity regardless.
  • Co-occurrence graph — recent-activity anchored, not picker-driven.
  • Source & topic profiles — all-time data for the topic; the picker doesn’t affect them.
Rolling 7 days is a sliding live window for “current vibes”; switch to Weekly to compare specific weeks side-by-side.
live window
Topic

Election Year Leadership Timing

4 items · 4 aliases · peaked week of 12 Apr 2026 · first seen 28 Apr 2026

A critical commentary on National Party MPs' quiet campaign against Prime Minister Luxon, arguing that internal leadership speculation risks destabilising the party without offering a viable alternative or mandate.

Volume by source orientation Methodology →

Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.

Alias drift

How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.

Free account Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge. Create a free account Log in

In the press Methodology →

How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 1 article from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.

12-week press volume 1 article
Free account Create a free account to see every headline on this topic — plus alerts when framing shifts or discourse and press diverge. Create a free account Log in

Heard on radio

Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.

  • All right, now, I've tried very hard to understand the government decision to essentially cancel sale GP in Auckland for next year, and I just can't. I cannot understand what has gone on here, because it sounds to me like this has come down to a few hundred thousand dollars. Now, what happened? I'm just going to run you through the timeline. What happened is that, remember, we've been fighting for sale GP to stay in New Zealand, and particularly in Auckland, for the last few years. So then October last year, the government and Auckland Council agreed to pay five million dollars combined. mind for sale GP to be held in Auckland. That was in October. Then in February, there was a request from sale GP for more money, which would have come out of the major events fund. And that, that request in February appears to be what has triggered Louise Upston to say no. Now finding out how much that request was for was incredibly difficult today. No one wanted to tell me the number. Eventually I was told it was less than a million dollars and might have been closer to $500,000. Now if that is true. Then turning down sale GP because of $500,000 is nutty because that is peanuts for a government and money that would almost certainly have made more money. I would say that was a wise investment because sale GP is not just about what people spend in Auckland when they come here for it. It's also about just like with the America's Cup, what everyone around the world watching the event sees. They see Auckland's beautiful harbour on a stunning day. They see crowds having fun. They see beautiful buildings, beautiful maunga. You cannot pay for that kind of international exposure. We have blown tens of millions of dollars on the America's Cup over the years. We paid for Lincoln Park, for God's sake, to come to Auckland. We set aside $70 million for major events just like this one, and yet we turned down this one, one of the hottest sailing events, over $500,000. Now, just on a political level, this makes no sense to me because Auckland has been desperate and has been begging the government for help with events like this to revive the city. We've just got that underway and then this happens in election year in a city that needs to be won to win the election and this is a city that is already showing signs of starting to lean left. Now I'm open to arguments to the contrary but this just seems like a really bad decision to me.
Free account Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language. Create a free account Log in

Sample framings

Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.

blue-review Centre-right

coup timing fails to produce viable outcomes

Time to put up or shut up
18 Apr
Free account Create a free account to unlock the full set here — plus alerts when framing shifts or an MP adopts new language. Create a free account Log in

Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.