the education ministry's method of counting qualifications has been criticized for inflating reported achievement and failing to reflect actual student outcomes
Up to 12 framings across outlets and orientations — each a short phrase the extractor generated to characterise the piece's editorial angle (not a quote). Filter by lean to see how each bloc is spinning the story; click through to read the original.
historical practice undermines accuracy
Those leaving school with no qualifications higher than stateddeliberate concealment of true student failure rates
This is HUGE re the outcomes of our Education system.Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
The methodology's no secret. It's clearly stated in the data definitions for the statistics. But it seems nobody's paid it any attention. The Ministry's data and insights general manager Grant …
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
