This piece critiques two opinion articles about the Maiki Sherman media controversy, arguing that both propagate a conspiratorial narrative of right-wing media networks undermining democracy, while misrepresenting the motivation behind the original Substack article on media bias.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
exposing hidden power behind public discourse
Two Tribes, One Argument: Salmond, Dutta, and the Grammar of Progressive PolemicSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.