The post questions the legitimacy of immigrants receiving New Zealand pensions without working or paying taxes, reflecting skepticism about welfare access and fairness.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
On paper, New Zealand Super is one of the simplest parts of our welfare system. Most people become eligible at 65. It's not means tested, and for decades it's been treated as a kind of social contract. You work hard, you reach retirement, and the state will be there. But that contract is under growing pressure. As our population ages and governments look for ways to contain long-term costs, the debate keeps returning. Should we raise the age of eligibility? And if we do, who pays the price? Today on the front page, Auckland University Business School Associate Professor Susan St. John is with us to talk about the future of superannuation, the arguments for and against raising the retirement age, and why this debate never stays settled for long.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
targeting support where it makes the most difference
Powering up data-driven social investmenthighlighting growing hardship among older populations
Should New Zealand raise the age of NZ Super?Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.