Topic
Conversation Ethics
15 items
· 8 aliases
· first seen 8 May 2026
The post responds to a claim by questioning the validity of a common mistake in political discourse, implying a critique of perceived insensitivity or misrepresentation.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
13 social posts
·
53 engagement
Stance — 13 classified edges
Supportive
6
Critical
5
Neutral / explainer
1
Mocking
1
Sentiment — 13 classified posts
Neutral
4
Negative
9
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
twitter
· @NZFreeSpeech
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 25
· ↻ 6
· 💬 3
· 46 engagement
6 May
-
youtube
· @UCLfT4rAdXcvpEHjpbBtiP6g
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 4
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 4 engagement
15 May
-
youtube
· @UC0CccC4SX47d0rXuEQ59fTg
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
17 Jun
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.