The piece discusses the potential for a coalition between Australia's opposition and One Nation, framed by polling data and political strategy, while drawing parallels to New Zealand's Māori Party and questioning the viability of such alliances.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
So someone has tapped Taylor on the shoulder and said, listen, uh, you're gonna have to at least come to some accommodation with uh with with Pauline Hansen. And so the quote today the coalition he says will do whatever it can, quote unquote, to beat Labor. So that's the way he's framing this. It's going to be an overwhelming objective of the conservative forces in Australia to defeat, quote, the worst government at Australia's ever seen. The worst, uh certainly the worst Labour government in history over here.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
driven by numbers, not ideology
Murray Olds: Australian correspondent on opposition leader Angus Taylor leaving door open for One Nation partnershipSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
