A bill to criminalise non-consensual sexually explicit deepfakes has been proposed, aiming to expand the legal definition of intimate visual recordings to address growing abuse and harm, particularly in schools.
How the framings classify across 3 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 7 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
consent does not negate harm when shared
\\ \\ 3 June 2026\\ \\ Blog\\ \\ **Helen Clark Foundation's submission on Deepfake Digital Harm and Exploitation Bill** \\ \\ Our submission on the Bill that recently passed its first reading highlights one key change \\ \\ H\\ \\ Helen Clark Foundationcore rights undermined by non-consensual imagery
NZ is criminalising sexualised deepfakes – banning apps that make them should be nextSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
