The podcast critiques the public's reliance on cyclone category numbers, arguing that they are misleading and that the actual impacts—such as heavy rain, wind, and coastal erosion—are far more important than the numerical classification.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Totally. We see a lot of these cyclone warnings come through. It feels like all the time and, you know, increasingly so with, you know, climate change and the way these major weather events are getting more and more frequent.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
focus on preparedness over storm numbers
Cyclone Vaianu: Why category downgrade could be misleadingSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
