A podcast discussion questioning the viability and ideological underpinnings of current state asset sales proposals, particularly focusing on Kiwi Bank and the broader economic reality of remaining state holdings.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
This podcast is supported by our Vita retirement communities. Life your way. This is business, and of course it is also politics because asset sales are back on the agenda, especially for National and the Act Party. New Zealand First, not so much. So it may well be one of those things that, you know, gets tossed around as an idea, but in the reality of an MMP environment actually goes nowhere. Making the Kiwi Bank story slightly unique, though, is its role in the overall banking atmosphere of New Zealand and whether a bigger bank would solve any of the perceived competition problems that we have. People we know are prepared to change banks, right? So last year, when there was a free-for-all on those cashbacks for borrowing, people were moving freely like the wind. So the idea that there isn't competition doesn't appear to be true. But I'm in a minority, given everyone from the Commerce Commission to the finance minister argues otherwise. I also detect more broadly that asset sales are not as atopic, as edgy as they once were. Now, if you go back to the 80s in Labour under Douglas and Preble, asset sales were dynamite, and not all of them went well, which didn't help the pro sales argument. But the cold hardish reality here, 40 years on, is there isn't a lot left to sell. I mean, you've got some chunks of power companies, that's worth serious dough. We've got an airline, a TV network, a radio network, some farms. It's all it's all got a moderately piecemeal vibe to it, hasn't it? Kiwi Bank should be able to raise the sort of money it needs, and it should be allowed to grow. Is the counter to a partial sale that we what? We like small restricted banking, do we that hasn't been allowed to be all it could be, so we just say, oh, we're all anti-asset sales. In Kiwi Bank's case, you are holding back growth. But you say you look at, say, TV and Z and T B and Z's case, it would be about ideology, i.e., should this state run a television station, because the place isn't worth anything to sell if you put it on the market, no one to buy it. And in say the case of Genesis, it's about serious coin that we could badly use elsewhere. If this idea goes anywhere this election year, you would hope we are less hung up on ideology and more attuned to the nuances of the debate than we have been in the past. For more from the Mike Asking Breakfast, listen live to News Talks Ed B from 6 a.m. weekdays, or follow the podcast on iHeartRadio.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
market dynamics challenge state claims of lack of competition
Mike's Minute: Reality vs ideology re: asset salesSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.