A New Zealand podcast discussion on Labour's proposed public transport fare cap, focusing on cost, savings, and affordability in the context of the rising cost of living.
How the framings classify across 4 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Okay, it doesn't look right because you have said that 1.36 million Kiwis use public transport, and that on average people will save twelve hundred dollars a year. Now you take one point three six million, you times it by twelve hundred, you get to one point six billion dollars, not sixty five million.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
direct financial benefit to city dwellers
Public Transport snobbishness and double standards attack Labour’s capped Fare policy but commuters will love it!economic fairness, reduced financial stress
Release: Labour to deliver unlimited public transport for $20-max a weekSocial-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
