A critical analysis of Australia's federal budget, focusing on the ineffectiveness and political implications of negative gearing, minimal tax benefits, and fiscal mismanagement, with commentary on political instability and its potential impact on New Zealand's policy discourse.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Incredible. I'm getting confused now because this one nation success out of Farah and the and this alleged coalition. It's is is it the difference between the coalition between One Nation and the Libs versus the coalition between One Nation and the Nationals? Because I'm watching some guy yesterday go, never, never, never, never, never in a million years. So who's doing business with who if there's any business being done at all?
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
fragile and deeply divided
Steve Price: Australia Correspondent on the federal budget, the tax break for workers, capital gains taxSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
