Political discourse, rhetoric, and debate surrounding negative or hostile language directed at immigrants and migrants, including its use by politicians and parties, and public and governmental responses to such language in New Zealand and internationally.
How the framings classify across 15 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Up to 12 framings across outlets and orientations — each a short phrase the extractor generated to characterise the piece's editorial angle (not a quote). Filter by lean to see how each bloc is spinning the story; click through to read the original.
characterised as offensive and attention-seeking
The things that are and aren’t compatible with National’s valuescentral to One Nation's populist appeal and backlash
Another poll shows One Nation’s surge has turned around. Has the party peaked?Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 15 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Yeah, Christopher Luxon embracing the idea that social cohesion and immigration are incompatible. I think is buying into the anti-immigrant rhetoric that's being stoked by New Zealand first in …
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
