A High Court ruling finds the Superfund's investment policies fail to uphold human rights obligations, requiring it to revise its ethical investment framework in light of its investments in companies linked to Israeli settlements in occupied Palestine.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
Good afternoon. The High Court has found against the guardians of the Superfund for failing to uphold human rights obligations. John Minto and the Palestine Solidarity Network applied for a judicial review regarding the Superfund's ongoing investment in Airbnb, Motorola and a couple of other companies that trade with illegal Israeli settlements. Francis Joy Child Casey is counsel for the Palestine Solidarity Network. Hi, Francis. What's going to happen as a result of this? Does the Superfund necessarily have... They have to sell its investment in these companies.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
direct link to human rights abuses in occupied territories
Frances Joychild KC: counsel for Palestine Solidarity Network Aotearoa on their High Court winSpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
