This discussion paper explores how artificial intelligence is threatening democratic processes in New Zealand through nudging, microtargeting, epistemic bubbles, and algorithmic governance, and recommends individual, national, and international actions to safeguard democratic问责.
How the framings classify across 8 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 10 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
government balancing risks and efficiency
NZ warned against AI scepticism as Govt issues new regulatory guidanceadvocates for labelling and liability rules
If AI is addictive, where does the responsibility lie – with big tech or its users?Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
