This piece explores the potential addictive properties of generative AI, questions who should bear responsibility for its overuse—particularly tech companies—and draws on historical cases like tobacco and gambling to argue for stronger regulation and accountability.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
blames tech companies for addictive design
If AI is addictive, where does the responsibility lie – with big tech or its users?Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.