Agri-tech leaders and climate experts argue that farmers must be paid to adopt methane-reducing technologies due to lack of productivity benefits, highlighting concerns over low adoption rates and the government's weakened emissions targets.
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 4 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
I was online, therefore saving greenhouse gases and also therefore able to observe quite a lot. And various solutions were proposed, but most farmers would say we need it to be neutral, fiscally neutral or a benefit in order not to be able to cut back on the productivity that the country needs. And so they're waiting for actual. real positive data from on farm and we're still a way to go but that has been the case for some time and it is one of the problems with research particularly when you're trying to change the metabolism of the animal which has evolved to be what it is.
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations. Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance — not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
genuine partnership driving practical innovation
Government & Industry accelerate world-leading farm technologySpotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
