The composition, ranking, and candidate selection decisions within the ACT Party's parliamentary list, including the rationale for placing specific candidates and the strategic and internal dynamics that shape the party's electoral lineup.
How the framings classify across 5 articles. Each framing is labelled by a small AI stance classifier; see the methodology page for details.
Up to 12 framings across outlets and orientations — each a short phrase the extractor generated to characterise the piece's editorial angle (not a quote). Filter by lean to see how each bloc is spinning the story; click through to read the original.
strategic inclusion of non-traditional candidates
Paul Henry’s high Act list ranking leaves sitting MPs at riskconfident, deterministic
One Candidate, One Pint: Paul Henry on never giving a shit what anyone thinksStacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
How the news corpus has covered this same topic over the last 12 weeks. 5 articles from RNZ, Stuff, NZ Herald, ODT, 1News, Newsroom and The Spinoff. Click through to the press view for the full panel.
Verbatim segments from politicians speaking on podcasts and radio shows about this topic. Sourced via the voice-reference library — each speaker has been confirmed manually from their voice clip. Click play to stream the original audio from the publisher, pre-seeked to the moment the quote starts.
But um if you're worried about you know, quality of people, uh probably wouldn't look at the ACT party with my concerns. I'd I'd probably look a bit closer to …
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from the social lens. Engagement is likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used across the digest cards. View on /social →
Spotted something wrong on this page? Report a correction.
