Topic
Act Party Initiative
9 items
· 5 aliases
· first seen 8 May 2026
The post discusses the online harm inquiry led by ACT, arguing against immediate bans and emphasizing the need for careful consideration of expert and parental input before implementing social media regulation.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
7 social posts
·
50 engagement
Stance — 7 classified edges
Supportive
5
Critical
1
Neutral / explainer
1
Sentiment — 7 classified posts
Positive
2
Neutral
2
Negative
3
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
youtube
· @UC435WmmyK8LjSwLASR0Wn4g
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 20
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 20 engagement
7 May
-
youtube
· @UCCfR52nTCjqZ1Rmm_v44NTw
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 15
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 15 engagement
11 May
-
twitter
· @parmjeet_parmar
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 4
· ↻ 0
· 💬 2
· 10 engagement
6 Oct
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.