This bill amends the Serious Fraud Office Act 1990 to ensure that the Serious Fraud Office can more effectively carry out its role by updating provisions relating to search warrants and evidence admissibility.
This bill has been accorded urgency in the House.
First detected 25 August 2026, 8:06am UTC.
Member in charge:
Hon Paul Goldsmith
· urgency accorded 25 Aug 2026 (the remaining stages of)
Urgency compresses the timetable, not the politics. Until the third reading, the
committee of the whole House can still amend the bill — changes are moved right up
to the final vote. The channels that operate at this speed:
Contact the member in charge
— Hon Paul Goldsmith —
whose office decides what amendments are put, and
your electorate MP.
Members’ offices monitor correspondence while the House sits; a specific,
clause-level point travels furthest.
Contact the opposition spokesperson for
this portfolio — they speak and move amendments in the committee stage, and
concrete problems raised by affected people are exactly what they put on the record.
Start or sign a petition at
petitions.parliament.nz
— the formal channel that stays open regardless of the House’s timetable.
Who spoke in the debates
Members who took a call in this bill’s debates, from our Hansard corpus. Under
urgency several bills are often debated together (a “cognate” debate), so
speakers may be addressing the group of bills.
AI-assisted analysis · every claim links to primary source ·
corrections
Published 25 Aug 2026, 7:20pm UTC (separate from, and later than, the alert timestamp above)
· model: claude-opus-4-8
In short: The SFO may apply for a search warrant to search intangible things, including email addresses and internet data storage facilities, not just physical places.
What changes
Expands a powerThe SFO may apply for a search warrant to search intangible things, including email addresses and internet data storage facilities, not just physical places.
cl 6 → Serious Fraud Office Act 1990, s 10
· affects: persons under SFO investigation, users of internet data storage facilities, Serious Fraud Office
· confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“The Director may, by application in writing, apply for a warrant to search any place or other thing specified in the application.”
Expands a powerThe SFO may apply for a search warrant orally or by personal appearance if the delay of a written application would compromise the search's effectiveness.
cl 6 → Serious Fraud Office Act 1990, s 10
· affects: Serious Fraud Office, issuing officers, persons under SFO investigation
· confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“an issuing officer may allow an application for a search warrant to be made orally (for example, by telephone call) or by personal appearance”
Expands a powerA warrant may authorise a remote access search of a thing such as an internet data storage facility that has no physical address a person can enter.
cl 7 → Serious Fraud Office Act 1990, s 12B
· affects: users of internet data storage facilities, Serious Fraud Office, persons under SFO investigation
· confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“Every person (other than a constable) executing a warrant issued under Part 2 authorising a remote access search may— (a) use reasonable measures to gain access to the thing to be searched”
Expands a powerA warrant may be executed on more than one occasion and for a period up to 30 days from issue, instead of a single entry within 14 days.
cl 6 → Serious Fraud Office Act 1990, s 10A
· affects: persons under SFO investigation, Serious Fraud Office, issuing officers
· confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“if the issuing officer is satisfied that a period of longer than 14 days is necessary for execution, a period specified by the issuing officer not exceeding 30 days from the date of issue”
Creates an obligationA person executing a remote access search warrant must notify the user of the searched thing by email after completion, or take reasonable steps to identify and inform them.
cl 7 → Serious Fraud Office Act 1990, s 12BA
· affects: users of things searched remotely, Serious Fraud Office
· confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“must, on completion of the search, send an electronic message to the email address of the thing searched— (a) attaching a copy of the search warrant”
Creates an obligationThe SFO must delete or destroy forensic copies of data that it determines does not contain evidential material.
cl 7A → Serious Fraud Office Act 1990, s 13A
· affects: persons whose devices are searched, Serious Fraud Office
· confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“if the person determines that the data does not contain any evidential material, ensure that the forensic copy and any copies made from that copy are deleted, erased, or otherwise destroyed”
Creates an obligationThe requirement to disclose prior warrant applications for the same place or thing extends from applications made in the previous 28 days to the previous 3 months.
cl 6 → Serious Fraud Office Act 1990, s 10
· affects: Serious Fraud Office, issuing officers
· confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“details of any other application for a search warrant that the Director knows to have been made within the previous 3 months in respect of the place or other thing proposed to be searched”
persons under SFO investigationusers of internet data storage facilitiesSerious Fraud Officeissuing officersdefendants in SFO prosecutionscourtsusers of things searched remotelypersons whose devices are searched
Scrutiny
Taken under urgency; the compressed timetable limited scrutiny even where a committee stage existed.
Commencement: The Act comes into force on the day after Royal assent.
Retrospective: no provision identified
Gaps we can see.
Clauses whose effect could not be established from the bill text alone:
cl 7B (repeal of section 14 — the existing text of section 14 is not fully reproduced in the bill, though the commentary indicates it duplicated the 28-day disclosure rule), cl 11 (amendment to Schedule 2 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 — effect on constables' warrant powers not determinable from the bill's own text without the Search and Surveillance Act), cl 12E / s 12E (application of Part 4 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 to constables — precise powers not determinable without that Act's text).
Method: the model reads the bill as published (claude-opus-4-8); every claim above carries a
verbatim span of that text, checked mechanically — claims that fail the check are
dropped, not softened. Text analysed from
an archived copy of the
official text.
Full methodology →
The law, before and after
Deterministic — no AI involved
Every amendment instruction in the bill, executed mechanically against the archived text
of the Act it changes. Struck text is removed,
highlighted text is added.
11 operations resolved; 3 listed with
the reason they couldn’t be — a visible gap, not a hidden one.
Text insertedcl 4 — Section 2 amended (Interpretation)
(section 2)
The bill says: In section 2, insert in their appropriate alphabetical order:
2 Interpretation
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-
corporation means a body of persons, whether incorporated or not, and whether incorporated or established in New Zealand or elsewhere
designated member means the Director and any other employee of the Serious Fraud Office who is designated by the Director as a person whose position in the Office enables him or her to exercise the powers conferred by this Act
Director means the Director of the Serious Fraud Office
document means a document in any form whether signed or initialled or otherwise authenticated by its maker or not; and includes-
(a) any writing on any material:
(b) any information recorded or stored by means of any tape recorder, computer, or other device; and any material subsequently derived from information so recorded or stored:
(c) any label, marking, or other writing that identifies or describes any thing of which it forms part, or to which it is attached by any means:
(d) any book, map, plan, graph, or drawing:
(e) any photograph, film, negative, tape, or other device in which 1 or more visual images are embodied so as to be capable (with or without the aid of some other equipment) of being reproduced
employee, in relation to the Serious Fraud Office,-
(a) means the Director and any other person employed by the Serious Fraud Office, whether paid by salary, wages, or otherwise:
(b) includes, for the period of his or her secondment, any person seconded to the Serious Fraud Office from any other department or other employer:
(c) does not include a person appointed under section 34
information includes data, documents, and forecasts
inland revenue offence means-
(a) any offence against any Act specified in Schedule 1 of the Tax Administration Act 1994; and
(b) any offence against any Act in relation to any tax imposed or payable, or any refund made or claimed, under any of the Acts specified in Schedule 1 of the Tax Administration Act 1994
Judge means any Judge of the High Court or the District Court
member, in relation to the Serious Fraud Office,-
(a) means any employee of the Serious Fraud Office; and
(b) includes, for the purposes of any particular investigation, any person who is deemed to be a member in accordance with section 34(2)
person includes a body of persons whether incorporated or not
place includes any premises, building, aircraft, ship, carriage, vehicle, box, or receptacle
prescribed means prescribed by regulations made under this Act
protected information means any information that is protected from disclosure-
(a) under section 36; or
(b) under the Tax Administration Act 1994; or
(c) under any other Act,-
but does not include-
(d) information that has been lawfully released under any other Act in circumstances where the person to whom it has been released is under no obligation to maintain secrecy in respect of the information; or
(e) information that has ceased to be protected information in accordance with section 43
serious or complex fraud includes a series of connected incidents of fraud which, if taken together, amount to serious or complex fraud.
access, in relation to a computer system, means to instruct, communicate with, store data in, receive data from, or otherwise make use of any of the resources of the computer system
access information includes codes, passwords, encryption keys, and any related information that enables access to a computer system or any other data storage device
computer system-
means-
a computer; or
2 or more interconnected computers; or
any communication links between computers or to remote terminals or another device; or
2 or more interconnected computers combined with any communication links between computers or to remote terminals or any other device; and
includes any part of the items described in paragraph (a) and all related input, output, processing, storage, software, or communication facilities, and stored data
evidential material has the same meaning as in section 3(1) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012
issuing officer has the same meaning as in section 3(1) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012
remote access search means a search of a thing such as an internet data storage facility that does not have a physical address that a person can enter and search
thing includes an intangible thing (for example, an email address or access information to an internet data storage facility)
Note: the added text is shown at the end of the provision; the bill slots it into the provision's own ordering (e.g. alphabetically among definitions).
Text insertedcl 4 — Section 2 amended (Interpretation)
(section 2)
The bill says: In section 2, insert as subsection (2):
2 Interpretation
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,-
corporation means a body of persons, whether incorporated or not, and whether incorporated or established in New Zealand or elsewhere
designated member means the Director and any other employee of the Serious Fraud Office who is designated by the Director as a person whose position in the Office enables him or her to exercise the powers conferred by this Act
Director means the Director of the Serious Fraud Office
document means a document in any form whether signed or initialled or otherwise authenticated by its maker or not; and includes-
(a) any writing on any material:
(b) any information recorded or stored by means of any tape recorder, computer, or other device; and any material subsequently derived from information so recorded or stored:
(c) any label, marking, or other writing that identifies or describes any thing of which it forms part, or to which it is attached by any means:
(d) any book, map, plan, graph, or drawing:
(e) any photograph, film, negative, tape, or other device in which 1 or more visual images are embodied so as to be capable (with or without the aid of some other equipment) of being reproduced
employee, in relation to the Serious Fraud Office,-
(a) means the Director and any other person employed by the Serious Fraud Office, whether paid by salary, wages, or otherwise:
(b) includes, for the period of his or her secondment, any person seconded to the Serious Fraud Office from any other department or other employer:
(c) does not include a person appointed under section 34
information includes data, documents, and forecasts
inland revenue offence means-
(a) any offence against any Act specified in Schedule 1 of the Tax Administration Act 1994; and
(b) any offence against any Act in relation to any tax imposed or payable, or any refund made or claimed, under any of the Acts specified in Schedule 1 of the Tax Administration Act 1994
Judge means any Judge of the High Court or the District Court
member, in relation to the Serious Fraud Office,-
(a) means any employee of the Serious Fraud Office; and
(b) includes, for the purposes of any particular investigation, any person who is deemed to be a member in accordance with section 34(2)
person includes a body of persons whether incorporated or not
place includes any premises, building, aircraft, ship, carriage, vehicle, box, or receptacle
prescribed means prescribed by regulations made under this Act
protected information means any information that is protected from disclosure-
(a) under section 36; or
(b) under the Tax Administration Act 1994; or
(c) under any other Act,-
but does not include-
(d) information that has been lawfully released under any other Act in circumstances where the person to whom it has been released is under no obligation to maintain secrecy in respect of the information; or
(e) information that has ceased to be protected information in accordance with section 43
serious or complex fraud includes a series of connected incidents of fraud which, if taken together, amount to serious or complex fraud.
(2) For the purposes of the definition of computer system in subsection (1), a computer is interconnected with another computer if it can be lawfully used to provide access to that other computer-
with or without access information; and
whether or not either or both computers are currently turned on; and
whether or not access is currently occurring.
Note: the added text is shown at the end of the provision; the bill slots it into the provision's own ordering (e.g. alphabetically among definitions).
New provisioncl 5 — New section 3A inserted (Transitional, savings, and related provisions)
(section 3)
The bill says: After section 3, insert:
3A Transitional, savings, and related provisions
The transitional, savings, and related provisions set out in Schedule 1 have effect according to their terms.
10 Power to obtain search warrant
(1) The Director may, onby application in writing made on oath,writing, apply for a warrant to search any place or other thing specified in the application.
(2) Any Judge who, on such an application, is satisfied—
(a) that there are(1A) An application for a warrant must contain, in reasonable detail, the following particulars:
the grounds on which the application is made (including the reasons why the legal requirements for believing—issuing the warrant are believed by the Director to be satisfied):(i) that any information supplied pursuantthe address or another description of the place or other thing proposed to section 9 is falsebe entered, or misleading in a material particular;entered and searched, inspected, or examined:(ii) that a person has failed to comply with any obligation imposed pursuantdescription of the item or items or other evidential material believed to section 9;be in or
(iii)on the place or other thing that it is not practicable to serve a notice under section 9are sought by reason of the fact thatDirector.
(1B) The issuing officer—
may require the person cannot be located orDirector to supply further information concerning the grounds on which the search warrant is absent from New Zealandsought; but
must not, in any circumstances, require the Director to disclose the name, address, or any other good cause;identifying detail of an informant unless, and only to the extent that, such information is necessary for the issuing officer to assess either or both of the following:(iv) that the servicecredibility of a notice under section 9 might seriously prejudice the investigation; andinformant:(b) thatwhether there are reasonable groundsis a proper basis for believing that there may be, atissuing the place specifiedwarrant.
(1C) The Director must disclose in the application,application—
details of any documents or other thingapplication for a search warrant that may be relevantthe Director knows to an investigationhave been made within the previous 3 months in respect of the place or mayother thing proposed to be evidencesearched; and
the result of any offence involving seriousthat application or complex fraud,—those applications.(1D) However, an issuing officer may issueallow an application for a search warrant into be made orally (for example, by telephone call) or by personal appearance and excuse the prescribed form.applicant from putting all or any part of the application (including any required material) in writing if—(3) Part 3 shall applythe issuing officer is satisfied that the delay that would be caused by requiring an applicant to put all or any such warrant.part of the application (including any required material) in writing would compromise the effectiveness of the search; and
the issuing officer is satisfied that the question of whether the warrant should be issued can properly be determined on the basis of an oral communication or a personal appearance.
The bill says: In section 10(2), replace "Judge" with "issuing officer".
10 Power to obtain search warrant
(1) The Director may, on application in writing made on oath, apply for a warrant to search any place specified in the application.
(2) Any Judgeissuing officer who, on such an application, is satisfied-
(a) that there are reasonable grounds for believing-
(i) that any information supplied pursuant to section 9 is false or misleading in a material particular; or
(ii) that a person has failed to comply with any obligation imposed pursuant to section 9; or
(iii) that it is not practicable to serve a notice under section 9 by reason of the fact that the person cannot be located or is absent from New Zealand or other good cause; or
(iv) that the service of a notice under section 9 might seriously prejudice the investigation; and
(b) that there are reasonable grounds for believing that there may be, at the place specified in the application, any documents or other thing that may be relevant to an investigation or may be evidence of any offence involving serious or complex fraud,-
may issue a warrant in the prescribed form.
(3) Part 3 shall apply to any such warrant.
Shown as writtencl 6 — Section 10 amended (Power to obtain search warrant)
(section 10(2)(b))
The bill says: In section 10(2)(b), after "place", insert "or in or on the other thing".
We haven’t applied this one as a diff: the quoted text appears 2 times in the provision and the instruction points at one place — no diff is shown rather than guessing which occurrence.
10 Power(3) Part 3 applies to obtain searchany warrant issued under this section.(1) The Director may, on application in writing made on oath, apply for a warrant to search any place specified in(4) If the application.
(2) Any Judge who, on such an application, is satisfied—
(a) that there are reasonable grounds for believing—
(i) that any information supplied pursuant to section 9 is false or misleading in a material particular; or
(ii) that a person has failed to comply with any obligation imposed pursuant to section 9; or
(iii) that itwarrant is not practicableintended to serve a notice under section 9 by reason of the fact that the person cannot be located or is absent from New Zealand or other good cause; or
(iv) that the service ofauthorise a notice under section 9 might seriously prejudiceremote access search, the investigation; and
(b) that there arewarrant must contain, in reasonable grounds for believingdetail, any access information that there may be, at the place specified inidentifies the application, any documents or other thing that may be relevant to an investigation or may be evidence of any offence involving serious or complex fraud,—
may issue a warrant in the prescribed form.
(3) Part 3 shall apply to any such warrant.searched remotely.
10 Power to obtainApplication for search warrant
(1) The Director may, onby application in writing made on oath,writing, apply for a warrant to search any place or other thing specified in the application.
(2) Any Judge who,An application for a warrant must contain, in reasonable detail, the following particulars:
the grounds on which the application is made (including the reasons why the Director believes that the legal requirements for issuing the warrant have been satisfied):
the address or another description of the place or other thing proposed to be entered, entered and searched, inspected, or examined:
a description of the item or items or other evidential material believed to be in or on the place or other thing that are sought by the Director:
the period for which the warrant is sought.
(3) The issuing officer—
may require the Director to supply further information concerning the grounds on which the search warrant is sought; but
must not, in any circumstances, require the Director to disclose the name, address, or any other identifying detail of an informant unless, and only to the extent that, such information is necessary for the issuing officer to assess either or both of the following:
the credibility of the informant:
whether there is a proper basis for issuing the warrant.
(4) The Director must disclose in the application—
details of any other application for a search warrant that the Director knows to have been made within the previous 3 months in respect of the place or other thing proposed to be searched; and
the result of that application or those applications.
(5) However, an application,issuing officer may allow an application for a search warrant to be made orally (for example, by telephone call) or by personal appearance and excuse the applicant from putting all or any part of the application (including any required material) in writing if—
the issuing officer is satisfied—satisfied that the delay that would be caused by requiring an applicant to put all or any part of the application (including any required material) in writing would compromise the effectiveness of the search; and(a)the issuing officer is satisfied that the question of whether the warrant should be issued can properly be determined on the basis of an oral communication or a personal appearance; and
the information required by subsections (2) to (4) is supplied (whether orally, or partly orally and partly in writing) to the issuing officer.
(6) An issuing officer who allows an application for a search warrant to be made under subsection (5) must record the grounds for the application as soon as practicable.
10A Issuing of search warrant
(1) An issuing officer may issue a warrant in the prescribed form if satisfied that—
there are reasonable grounds for believing—
(i) that any information supplied pursuant to section 9 is false or misleading in a material particular; or
(ii) that a person has failed to comply with any obligation imposed pursuant to section 9; or
(iii) that it is not practicable to serve a notice under section 9 by reason of the fact that the person cannot be located orlocated, is absent from New ZealandZealand, or any other good cause; or
(iv) that the service of a notice under section 9 might seriously prejudice the investigation; and
(b) that there are reasonable grounds for believing that there may be, at the place or in or on the other thing specified in the application, any documents or other thing that may be relevant to an investigation or may be evidence of any offence involving serious or complex fraud,—fraud.(2) The issuing officer may issue aauthorise the search warrant to be executed on more than 1 occasion during the period in which the prescribed form.warrant is in force if satisfied that this is required for the purposes for which the warrant is being issued.
(3) Part 3 shallEvery warrant must contain, in reasonable detail, the following particulars:
the period during which the warrant may be executed, being—
a period specified by the issuing officer not exceeding 14 days from the date of issue; or
if the issuing officer is satisfied that a period of longer than 14 days is necessary for execution, a period specified by the issuing officer not exceeding 30 days from the date of issue:
if the warrant may be executed on more than 1 occasion, the number of times that the warrant may be executed:
if the warrant is intended to authorise a remote access search, any access information that identifies the thing to be searched remotely.
(4) However, the issuing officer may not issue a search warrant authorising the remote access search of a thing unless the issuing officer is satisfied that the thing is not located at a physical address that a person can enter and search.
(5) Sections 12A to 28 apply to any such warrant.warrant issued under this section.
10B Retention of documents
A copy (whether in electronic form or otherwise) of every written application for a search warrant made under section 10(1), or (in the case of an oral application) the record of the application made by the issuing officer under section 10(6), must be retained under the control of the Registrar of the office of the District Court at which, or under the control of the Registrar of the office of the District Court that is closest to the place at which, the application was made until,—
in a case where a search warrant is issued, the completion of any proceedings in respect of which the validity of the warrant may be in issue; or
in any other case, the expiry of 2 years after the records were first retained under the control of the Registrar of the District Court.
Replacedcl 7 — Section 12 and cross-heading replaced
(section 12 and the cross-heading above section 12)
The bill says: Replace section 12 and the cross-heading above section 12 with:
12 Effect of warrant issued under Part 1
(1) Every warrant issued under this Act shall authorisePart 1 authorises the person executingexercising the warrant—
(a) to enter and search the place specified in the warrant on 1 occasion within 14 days of the date of issue of the warrant at any time whichthat is reasonable in the circumstances:
(b) to use suchany assistance asthat is reasonable in the circumstances:
(c) to use suchany force both for gaining entry and for breaking open anything in or on the place searched asthat is reasonable in the circumstances:
(d) to search for and remove any documents or other thing that the person executing the warrant believes on reasonable grounds may be relevant to the investigation or may be evidence of any offence involving serious or complex fraud:
(e) where necessary, to take copies of any documents, or extracts from documents, that the person executing the warrant believes on reasonable grounds may be relevant to the investigation:
(f) where necessary, to require any person to reproduce, or to assist any person executing the warrant to reproduce, in usable form, any information recorded or stored in any such documents.
(2) Every person called upon to assist the person or persons executing the warrant shall havehas the powers contained in paragraphs (c) and (d) of subsection (1).(1)(c) and (d).
(3) Any warrant shallissued under Part 1 is subject to any reasonable conditions that the issuer specifies in the warrant.
12AA Disclosure of previous applications
Any person applying for a warrant under Part 1 must, having made reasonable enquiries, disclose on the application—
details of any other applications for a warrant that that person knows to have been made within the previous 28 days by a member of the Serious Fraud Office in respect of the place specified; and
the result of that application or those applications.
12A Effect of warrant issued under Part 2
(1) Every warrant issued under Part 2 authorises the person (other than a constable) exercising the warrant—
to enter and search the place or other thing specified in the warrant on 1 occasion within 14 days of the issue of the warrant at any time that is reasonable in the circumstances on the number of occasions and within the period set out in the warrant:
to request any person to assist with the entry and search (including, without limitation, a member of a hapū or an iwi if the place to be entered is of cultural or spiritual significance to that hapū or iwi):
to use any force both for gaining entry and for breaking open anything in or on the place or other thing searched that is reasonable in the circumstances:
to use any force in respect of any property that is reasonable for the purposes of carrying out the entry and search and any lawful seizure:
to search for and remove any documents or other thing that the person executing the warrant believes on reasonable grounds may be relevant to the investigation or may be evidence of any offence involving serious or complex fraud:
to bring and use in or on the place or other thing searched any equipment, to use any equipment found in or on the place or other thing, and to extract any electricity from the place or other thing to operate the equipment that it is reasonable to use in the circumstances, for the purpose of carrying out the entry and search:
to use any reasonable measures to access a computer system or other data storage device located (in whole or in part) at the place or other thing if any intangible material that is the subject of the search may be in that computer system or other device:
if any intangible material accessed under paragraph (f) is the subject of the search or may otherwise be lawfully seized, to copy that material (including by means of previewing, cloning, or other forensic methods either before or after removal for examination):
where necessary, to take copies of any documents, or extracts from documents, that the person executing the warrant believes on reasonable grounds may be relevant to the investigation:
where necessary, to require any person to reproduce, or to assist any person executing the warrant to reproduce, in usable form, any information recorded or stored in any such documents.
(2) Any warrant issued under Part 2 is subject to any reasonable conditions asthat the issuer specifies in the warrant.
12B Remote access search of thing authorised by warrant issued under Part 2
Every person (other than a constable) executing a warrant issued under Part 2 authorising a remote access search may—
use reasonable measures to gain access to the thing to be searched; and
if any intangible material in the thing is the subject of the search or may specifyotherwise be lawfully seized, copy that material (including by means of previewing, cloning, or other forensic methods).
12BA Identifications and notice requirements for remote access search
(1) Every person (other than a constable) who executes a warrant issued under Part 2 authorising a remote access search must, on completion of the search, send an electronic message to the email address of the thing searched—
attaching a copy of the search warrant; and
setting out the following particulars:
the date and time of the commencement and completion of the search:
the name and unique identifier of the person who had overall responsibility for that search:
the address of the office to which inquiries should be made.
(2) If the person conducting the search is unable to deliver the electronic message required by subsection (1) (or it is returned undelivered), the person must take all reasonable steps to identify the user of the thing searched and to send the information referred to in subsection (1)(a) and (b) to that person.
12C Powers of person called to assist
(1) Every person (other than a constable) called on to assist a person (other than a constable) exercising a warrant issued under Part 2 is subject to the control of the person with overall responsibility for exercising that warrant.
(2) Every person (other than a constable) called on to assist a person exercising a warrant issued under Part 2 may—
enter and search the place or other thing specified in the warrant:
while under the direction of the person exercising the warrant, use reasonable force in respect of any property for the purpose of carrying out the entry and search and any lawful seizure:
search for and remove any documents or other things that the person executing the warrant believes on reasonable grounds may be relevant to the investigation or may be evidence of any offence involving serious or complex fraud:
use any reasonable measures to access a computer system or other data storage device located (in whole or in part) at the place or other thing if any intangible material that is the subject of the search may be in that computer system or other device:
if any intangible material accessed under paragraph (d) is the subject of the search or may otherwise be lawfully seized, copy that material (including by means of previewing, cloning, or other forensic methods either before or after removal for examination).
(3) Every person (other than a constable) called on to assist a person (other than a constable) executing a warrant issued under Part 2 authorising a remote access search may—
use reasonable measures to gain access to the thing to be searched; and
if any intangible material in the thing is the subject of the search or may otherwise be lawfully seized, copy that material (including by means of previewing, cloning, or other forensic methods).
12D Securing place or other thing to be searched
(1) Every person (other than a constable) executing a warrant issued under Part 2 may, in a manner and for a duration that is reasonable for the purpose of executing the warrant,—
secure the place or other thing searched, any area in or on that place or other thing, or any thing found in or on that place or other thing:
exclude any person from the place or other thing searched, or from any area within the place or other thing, or give any other reasonable direction to such a person, if the person executing the warrant has reasonable grounds to believe that the person will obstruct or hinder the exercise of any power under this subsection.
(2) A person (other than a constable) who exercises any power under subsection (1) must, on the request of any person affected by the exercise of the power,—
identify themselves either by name or by unique identifier; and
identify this Act and state the reason for the search unless it is impracticable to do so in the circumstances; and
if not in Police uniform, produce evidence of his or her their identity.
12E Powers of constable executing, or assisting in execution of, warrant issued under Part 2
The provisions of Part 4 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 apply to a constable who is executing a warrant issued under Part 2, or assisting in the execution of a warrant issued under Part 2, with any references to the exercise of a search power deemed to refer to the execution of a warrant issued under Part 2.
12F Limitation on exercise of powers
To avoid doubt, the powers conferred by sections 12A(1)(c) and 12C(2)(b) do not authorise the application of force to any person.
13 Return of documents and thingsAnyA person who, in executing any warrant issued under this Act, removes any document from the place specified inor thing pursuant to the warrant, shallwarrant must return the document ordocument, a copy of that documentdocument, or the thing as soon as practicable to the person who previously had the document in his or herthing in their possession or under his or hertheir control.
13A Disposal of forensic copies
(1) A person who makes a forensic copy of any data held in a computer system or other data storage device must, if the person determines that the data does not contain any evidential material, ensure that the forensic copy and any copies made from that copy are deleted, erased, or otherwise destroyed in a way that prevents retrieval of the copy or copies by any method.
(2) However, if an examination of the data shows that it contains a mixture of data that is evidential material and data that is not evidential material,—
the forensic copy of the data and any copies made of that copy may be retained in their entirety; and
the forensic copy and any copies made of that copy may continue to be searched, if such a search was authorised by the search power under which the data was seized and copied.
14 Disclosure of previous applications
Any person applying for a warrant under this Act shall, having made reasonable enquiries, disclose on the application—
(a) details of any other applications for a warrant which that person knows to have been made within the previous 28 days by a member of the Serious Fraud Office in respect of the place specified; and
(b) the result of that application or those applications.
Replacedcl 8 — Section 22 amended (Effect of final decision that exercise of powers unlawful)
(section 22(3))
The bill says: Replace section 22(3) with:
22 Effect of final decision that exercise of powers unlawful
(1) In any case where it is declared, in a final decision given in any proceedings in respect of the exercise of any powers conferred by this Act, that the exercise of any powers conferred by this Act is unlawful, to the extent to which the exercise of those powers is declared unlawful the Director shall ensure that forthwith after the decision of the court is given—
(a) any information obtained pursuant to the exercise of powers declared to be unlawful, and any record of such information, is destroyed:
(b) any documents, or extracts from documents, or other things removed pursuant to the exercise of powers declared to be unlawful are returned to the person previously having possession of them, or previously having them under his or her control, and any copies of such documents or extracts are destroyed:
(c) any information derived from or based upon such information, documents, extracts, or things is destroyed.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the court may, in the court’s discretion, order that any information, record, or copy of any document or extract may, instead of being destroyed,—
(a) be returned to the person from whom it was obtained; or
(b) be retained by the Serious Fraud Office subject to such terms and conditions as the court may impose.
(3) No information obtained,information, and no documents or extracts from documentsdocuments, or other things removed, pursuant tothings, obtained as a consequence of the exercise of any powers conferred by this Act that have been declared to be unlawful, and no record of any such information or documents, shall be—document,—(a)are admissible as evidence in any proceedings unless the court hearing thecriminal proceedings in whichif the evidence is sought to be adduced is satisfied that there was no unfairness in obtainingexcluded under section 30 of the evidence:Evidence Act 2006:(b)may otherwise be used in connection with the exercise of any power conferred by this Act unless the court that declared the exercise of the powers to be unlawful is satisfied that there was no unfairness in obtaining the evidence.
Compare: 1989 No 11 ss 27, 28
Search and Surveillance Act 2012 · 0 resolved, 1 unresolved
Shown as writtencl 11 — Schedule 2 amended
(Schedule 2)
The bill says: In Schedule 2, after the item relating to section 270 of the Sale and Supply of Alcohol Act 2012, insert:
We haven’t applied this one as a diff: this instruction restructures a schedule (tables, forms or lists), which we can't yet apply mechanically — the change is shown as written.
The new text the bill supplies:
Serious Fraud Office Act 1990 10 Constable may obtain and execute warrant to search for and seize any evidential material in respect of offence involving serious or complex fraud All
The bill says: In the Schedule, replace form 4 with the form 4 set out in Schedule 2 of this Act.
We haven’t applied this one as a diff: we couldn't identify which provision this instruction points at — the change is shown as written.
In-place amendments are anchor-verified: the instruction’s own quoted text must
occur in the archived provision, which proves the archive is current enough for that
operation. Whole-provision replacements show the provision as archived on the date given
— later amendments by other Acts, if any, would not appear. Rows marked
AI-read had unusually-phrased instructions translated into a standard operation
by a model; the translation is checked word-for-word against the instruction, and the
change is still applied and verified mechanically.
Full methodology →
Source record — the urgency motion as published
25 August 2026
— scope: the remaining stages of
(All remaining stages)
A motion to accord urgency to the following business was agreed to:
- the committee stage of:
- the Planning Bill; and
- the Natural Environment Bill; and
- the remaining stages of:
- the Emergency Management Bill (No 2);
- the Social Security (Jobseeker Support and Accommodation Supplement) Amendment Bill; and
- the Serious Fraud Office Amendment Bill.