OpenBrief
Log in Sign up
Automated — factual, not analysed

Oranga Tamariki (Responding to Serious Youth Offending) Amendment Bill

This bill establishes a young serious offender declaration and a new military-style academy order in the Oranga Tamariki Act 1989.

This bill has been accorded urgency in the House. First detected 15 September 2026, 4:25am UTC.

Member in charge: Hon Karen Chhour · Government bill · No. 99-2 · urgency accorded 15 Sep 2026 (the remaining stages of the)

Want a say? This bill is still moving

Urgency compresses the timetable, not the politics. Until the third reading, the committee of the whole House can still amend the bill — changes are moved right up to the final vote. The channels that operate at this speed:

  • Contact the member in charge — Hon Karen Chhour — whose office decides what amendments are put, and your electorate MP. Members’ offices monitor correspondence while the House sits; a specific, clause-level point travels furthest.
  • Contact the opposition spokesperson for this portfolio — they speak and move amendments in the committee stage, and concrete problems raised by affected people are exactly what they put on the record.
  • Start or sign a petition at petitions.parliament.nz — the formal channel that stays open regardless of the House’s timetable.

Who spoke in the debates

Members who took a call in this bill’s debates, from our Hansard corpus. Under urgency several bills are often debated together (a “cognate” debate), so speakers may be addressing the group of bills.

● Karen Chhour ACT · 110 ● Duncan Webb Labour · 10 ● Tamatha Paul Greens · 7 ● Ricardo Menéndez March Greens · 6 ● Willow-Jean Prime Labour · 6 Mariameno Kapa-Kingi · 4 ● Vanushi Walters Labour · 2 ● Casey Costello NZ First · 1 ● Hamish Campbell National · 1 ● Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke Te Pāti Māori · 1 ● Helen White Labour · 1 ● Hon Willie Jackson Labour · 1 ● Jamie Arbuckle NZ First · 1 ● Jenny Salesa Labour · 1 ● Kahurangi Carter Greens · 1 ● Nancy Lu National · 1 ● Paulo Garcia National · 1 ● Ryan Hamilton National · 1 ● Stuart Smith National · 1 ● Tracey McLellan Labour · 1

What this touches

Topics in the OpenBrief corpus matched to this bill’s title, with their volume over the last six weeks — how loud the subject already was when urgency was moved. This is retrieval against our existing corpus, not model judgement.

TopicPress items · 6wkSocial posts · 6wk
youth reoffending 6 1

What this bill changes

AI-assisted analysis · every claim links to primary source · corrections
Published 16 Sep 2026, 7:21pm UTC (separate from, and later than, the alert timestamp above) · model: claude-opus-4-8

In short: Creates a Youth Court "young serious offender" declaration for 14–17-year-olds and a military-style academy order allowing detention and use of force.

What changes
Expands a power The Youth Court may declare a young person a young serious offender if satisfied they are likely to reoffend, past interventions failed, and the declaration is necessary to reduce reoffending and promote compliance.
cl 4 → Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, s 320J · affects: young people aged 14 to 17 charged with specified offences, Youth Court · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“The Youth Court may, subject to sections 320G, 320H, and 320I, grant an application made under section 320E and make a YSO declaration declaring the young person who is the subject of the application to be a young serious offender”
Expands a power The Youth Court may order an eligible young serious offender aged 15 to 17 to undertake a military-style academy programme for 3 to 12 months and be placed in the custody of the chief executive.
cl 40 → Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, s 320S · affects: young serious offenders aged 15 to 17, chief executive of Oranga Tamariki · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“requiring the eligible young serious offender to undertake a military-style academy programme for a period of— (i) not less than 3 months; and (ii) not more than 12 months”
Expands a power The chief executive and approved workers of qualifying providers may use reasonable physical force on a young serious offender to prevent harm or absconding, excluding mechanical restraints and after de-escalation.
cl 40 → Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, s 320W · affects: young serious offenders subject to a military-style academy order, chief executive of Oranga Tamariki, approved workers of qualifying providers · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“A military-style academy order is sufficient authority for anyone who is authorised to detain an eligible young serious offender under section 320V to use physical force if they have reasonable grounds for believing that the use of such physical force is reasonably necessary to prevent the offender from absconding.”
Expands a power A constable may arrest a young serious offender without a warrant on reasonable grounds of a bail-condition breach.
cl 6 → Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, s 214AAA · affects: young serious offenders released on bail, New Zealand Police · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“A constable may arrest a young serious offender without a warrant if— (a) the young serious offender has been released on bail; and (b) the constable believes, on reasonable grounds, that the young serious offender has breached a condition of the bail.”
Removes a right The requirement to consult a youth justice co-ordinator and hold a family group conference before instituting proceedings does not apply to a young serious offender alleged to have offended while subject to a YSO declaration.
cl 12 → Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, s 245 · affects: young serious offenders alleged to have offended while subject to a declaration · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“However, nothing in this section applies to a young person who is— (a) a young serious offender; and (b) alleged to have committed an offence while subject to a YSO declaration.”
Changes a threshold Supervision orders and supervision with activity orders for young serious offenders may run up to 18 and 12 months respectively, rather than 6 months.
cl 18 → Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, s 283 · affects: young serious offenders subject to supervision orders · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“18 months, if— (A) the order is made in respect of a young person who is a young serious offender; and (B) the order is made in response to a charge referred to in section 320B(1)(a)(i) or (b) in connection with which the young person was declared a young serious offender”
Creates an obligation The court must apply additional sentencing factors for young serious offenders, including glorifying offending by livestreaming, posting, or distributing records of it.
cl 19 → Oranga Tamariki Act 1989, s 284 · affects: young serious offenders being sentenced, Youth Court · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“the court must consider the following factors in addition to those in subsection (1): (a) the seriousness of the offending: (b) the criminal history of the young person”
Expands a power The Chief Ombudsman's oversight of care or custody providers is extended to qualifying providers of military-style academy programmes.
Schedule → Oversight of Oranga Tamariki System Act 2022, s 8 · affects: qualifying providers, Chief Ombudsman · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“In section 8(1), definition of care or custody provider, after paragraph (c), insert: (d) a qualifying provider as defined in section 2(1) of that Act”
Who this affects
young people aged 14 to 17 charged with specified offencesYouth Courtyoung serious offenders aged 15 to 17chief executive of Oranga Tamarikiyoung serious offenders subject to a military-style academy orderapproved workers of qualifying providersyoung serious offenders released on bailNew Zealand Policeyoung serious offenders alleged to have offended while subject to a declarationyoung serious offenders subject to supervision ordersyoung serious offenders being sentencedqualifying providersChief Ombudsman
Scrutiny

Taken under urgency; the compressed timetable limited scrutiny even where a committee stage existed.

Commencement: The Act comes into force the day after Royal assent.
Retrospective: no provision identified
Gaps we can see. Clauses whose effect could not be established from the bill text alone: cl 42A (s 272A modification for 12-13 year olds — target text not shown), cl 21 (s 296J amendments — full current text of section not shown), cl 22 (s 296K electronic monitoring — replaced subsections depend on unseen surrounding text), cl 53 (s 239 detention restrictions — target text not shown), cl 55 (s 289 least restrictive outcome — target text not shown), cl 60 (s 293A disqualification from driving — effect of deletions not determinable), cl 63 (s 385 absconding offence — interaction with s 120 Crimes Act not fully determinable), cl 58 (s 447 regulation-making powers — scope of prescribed matters left to regulations).

Method: the model reads the bill as published (claude-opus-4-8); every claim above carries a verbatim span of that text, checked mechanically — claims that fail the check are dropped, not softened. Text analysed from an archived copy of the official text. Full methodology →

Source record — the urgency motion as published
15 September 2026 — scope: the remaining stages of the (All remaining stages)
A motion to accord urgency to the following business was agreed to:
- the remaining stages of the:
  - India Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill;
  - Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill;
  - Oranga Tamariki (Responding to Serious Youth Offending) Amendment Bill; and
  - Summary Offences (Move-on Orders) Amendment Bill
- the first reading, and referral to select committee of the:
  - References to Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi (Repeals) Amendment Bill;
  - References to Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi (Strength of Legislative Obligations) Amendment Bill; and
  - References to Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi (Standardisation) Amendment Bill
- the second reading and committee stage of the Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Amendment Bill;
- the remaining stages of the Public Works Amendment Bill;
- the committee stage of the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) (3 Day Postnatal Stay) Amendment Bill;
- the remaining stages of the:
  - Building (Earthquake-prone Buildings) Amendment Bill;
  - Policing Amendment Bill;
  - Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill;
  - Immigration (Enhanced Risk Management) Amendment Bill;
  - Land Transport (Revenue) Amendment Bill;
  - Financial Markets Conduct Amendment Bill; and
  - Commerce (Promoting Competition and Other Matters) Amendment Bill.
Source: Daily progress in the House → · Hansard for this sitting day →