OpenBrief
Log in Sign up
Automated — factual, not analysed

Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Amendment Bill

This bill amends the Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997 to give effect to the recommendations of the Agricultural and Horticultural Products Regulatory Review that relate to the principal Act.

This bill has been accorded urgency in the House. First detected 15 September 2026, 4:26am UTC.

Member in charge: Hon Andrew Hoggard · Government bill · No. 305-2 · urgency accorded 15 Sep 2026 (the second reading and committee stage of the)

This bill has passed — what remains open

The avenues that remain: petitions to Parliament (including seeking amendment or repeal); consultation on the regulations that often follow an Act, which do carry public submission windows; and the member in charge or your electorate MP on implementation problems — post-passage corrections ride in later amendment bills.

Stages observed

StageSitting dayRecord
Third reading 22 Sep 2026 The Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Amendment Bill was read a third time. source · debate & vote (Hansard)

Dates are sitting days as recorded by the Office of the Clerk; a sitting extended under urgency continues under its original day. Readings are decided by party vote: each party casts its members’ votes en bloc (proxies included), so the whole House needn’t be present and individual attendance isn’t recorded — the party-by-party tally for each reading is in that day’s Hansard, linked per stage above.

Who spoke in the debates

Members who took a call in this bill’s debates, from our Hansard corpus. Under urgency several bills are often debated together (a “cognate” debate), so speakers may be addressing the group of bills.

● Brooke van Velden ACT · 23 ● Mike Butterick National · 21 ● Andrew Hoggard ACT · 7 ● Mark Patterson NZ First · 7 ● Rachel Boyack Labour · 2 ● Rachel Brooking Labour · 2 ● Carl Bates National · 1 ● Dana Kirkpatrick National · 1 ● Jo Luxton Labour · 1 ● Miles Anderson National · 1 ● Phil Twyford Labour · 1 ● Reuben Davidson Labour · 1 ● Steve Abel Greens · 1 ● Suze Redmayne National · 1

What this touches

Topics in the OpenBrief corpus matched to this bill’s title, with their volume over the last six weeks — how loud the subject already was when urgency was moved. This is retrieval against our existing corpus, not model judgement.

TopicPress items · 6wkSocial posts · 6wk
medicines amendment bill 0 0

What this bill changes

AI-assisted analysis · every claim links to primary source · corrections
Published 16 Sep 2026, 7:20am UTC (separate from, and later than, the alert timestamp above) · model: claude-opus-4-8

In short: The bill empowers the Director-General to exempt low-risk agricultural compounds from registration, creates a research consent regime, and recognises overseas regulators' assessments.

What changes
Creates an obligation A person may import, manufacture, sell, or use an agricultural compound only if it is a registered trade name product, exempt, or covered by a consent under section 35AAD.
cl 9 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 8 · affects: importers of agricultural compounds, manufacturers, sellers, users of agricultural compounds · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“A person may use an agricultural compound only if— (a) the agricultural compound— (i) is a registered trade name product; or (ii) is exempt from registration under section 8AA or 8A”
Creates a right The Director-General may exempt any agricultural compound or class of agricultural compounds from the requirement to be registered.
cl 10 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 8AA · affects: applicants for agricultural compound approval, importers, manufacturers · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“The Director-General may exempt any agricultural compound or any class of agricultural compounds from the requirement to be registered under this subpart.”
Creates an obligation The Director-General must publish the reasons for granting an exemption, or a link to those reasons, together with the exemption.
cl 10 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 8AA · affects: the public, interested parties, the Director-General · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“The Director-General’s reasons for granting an exemption (or a link to a document that sets out those reasons) must be published together with the exemption.”
Creates a right A person may apply for a consent to import, manufacture, sell, and use an agricultural compound for research or to obtain further information without registering it.
cl 40 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 35AA · affects: researchers, applicants seeking registration data, agricultural compound businesses · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“A person may apply to the Director-General for consent— (a) to import, manufacture, or sell an agricultural compound to enable it to be used—”
Creates an obligation The Director-General must take into account, when evaluating risks and benefits, assessments held by them that were carried out by a recognised overseas regulator.
cl 20 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 20 · affects: applicants for registration, the Director-General, overseas regulators · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“any assessment of a recognised overseas regulator that— (i) is held by the Director-General; and (ii) has been carried out by that regulator for the purpose of determining whether to register”
Expands a power The Director-General may declare a person in another jurisdiction to be a recognised overseas regulator and must withdraw recognition if criteria are no longer met.
cl 21 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 20A · affects: overseas regulators, the Director-General, applicants · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“The Director-General may declare that a person in another jurisdiction is a recognised overseas regulator for the purposes of section 20(aa).”
Creates an obligation A manufacturer of an agricultural compound must comply with manufacturing practice standards specified by the Director-General to the extent required by a condition of registration, consent, or exemption.
cl 42 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 35FB · affects: manufacturers of agricultural compounds, people engaged in manufacturing · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“A manufacturer of an agricultural compound must comply with the manufacturing practice standards, and ensure that the people engaged in manufacturing the agricultural compound for the manufacturer comply with those standards”
Changes a threshold Statutory time limits for deciding and notifying applications are set by regulation rather than fixed in the Act.
cl 19 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 16 · affects: applicants for registration, the Director-General · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“The Director-General must decide the application within any period determined in accordance with the regulations.”
Creates an obligation Public notification of any matter required to be notified must be made by Gazette notice and by publication on the Ministry's website.
cl 75 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 82 · affects: the public, the Director-General, interested parties · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“If any matter is required to be publicly notified under this Act, it must be notified— (a) by notice in the Gazette; and (b) by publication on the Ministry’s Internet site.”
Removes a right Provisional registration of trade name products under section 27 is abolished by repealing sections 26 and 27.
cl 29 → Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Act 1997, s 27 · affects: holders of provisional registrations, applicants · confidence: high
The bill text this is based on
“29 Sections 26 and 27 repealed Repeal sections 26 and 27.”
Who this affects
importers of agricultural compoundsmanufacturerssellersusers of agricultural compoundsapplicants for agricultural compound approvalimportersthe publicinterested partiesthe Director-Generalresearchersapplicants seeking registration dataagricultural compound businessesapplicants for registrationoverseas regulatorsapplicantsmanufacturers of agricultural compoundspeople engaged in manufacturingholders of provisional registrations
Scrutiny

Taken under urgency; the compressed timetable limited scrutiny even where a committee stage existed.

Commencement: The Act comes into force on a date set by Order in Council, but listed provisions come into force the day after Royal assent, and any uncommenced part comes into force 2 years after Royal assent.
Retrospective: no provision identified
Sunset clause: 30 June 2029 (expiry of transitional clauses 6 and 8 of new Part 2 of Schedule 1 only)
Gaps we can see. Clauses whose effect could not be established from the bill text alone: cl 4 (Interpretation amendments – target Act definitions not fully shown), cl 5 (Scheme of Act amendment – effect depends on unseen section 4A text), cl 22 (prescription-medicine consent changes – net effect depends on unseen section 21 text), cl 24, 24A, 24B (term/renewal amendments – depend on unseen sections 22, 22A, 22B text), cl 30, 37 (renumbering/repositioning of sections 28 and 33 – substantive effect not determinable), cl 44–52 (Board of Inquiry, recognition and appeal amendments – depend on unseen target text), cl 56–67 (Part 6 confidential-information amendments – largely terminology changes over unseen text), cl 69 (Regulations amendments – scope depends on unseen section 75 text), cl 74 (penalties for failure to pay fee – depends on unseen section 81J text), cl 78 / Schedule 2 (consequential amendments to Animal Welfare Act 1999 and HSNO Act 1996).

Method: the model reads the bill as published (claude-opus-4-8); every claim above carries a verbatim span of that text, checked mechanically — claims that fail the check are dropped, not softened. Text analysed from an archived copy of the official text. Full methodology →

Source record — the urgency motion as published
15 September 2026 — scope: the second reading and committee stage of the (Second reading, Committee of the whole House)
A motion to accord urgency to the following business was agreed to:
- the remaining stages of the:
  - India Free Trade Agreement Legislation Amendment Bill;
  - Local Government (System Improvements) Amendment Bill;
  - Oranga Tamariki (Responding to Serious Youth Offending) Amendment Bill; and
  - Summary Offences (Move-on Orders) Amendment Bill
- the first reading, and referral to select committee of the:
  - References to Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi (Repeals) Amendment Bill;
  - References to Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi (Strength of Legislative Obligations) Amendment Bill; and
  - References to Tiriti o Waitangi/Treaty of Waitangi (Standardisation) Amendment Bill
- the second reading and committee stage of the Agricultural Compounds and Veterinary Medicines Amendment Bill;
- the remaining stages of the Public Works Amendment Bill;
- the committee stage of the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) (3 Day Postnatal Stay) Amendment Bill;
- the remaining stages of the:
  - Building (Earthquake-prone Buildings) Amendment Bill;
  - Policing Amendment Bill;
  - Corrections (Management of Prisoners, and Prisoners’ Property) Amendment Bill;
  - Immigration (Enhanced Risk Management) Amendment Bill;
  - Land Transport (Revenue) Amendment Bill;
  - Financial Markets Conduct Amendment Bill; and
  - Commerce (Promoting Competition and Other Matters) Amendment Bill.
Source: Daily progress in the House → · Hansard for this sitting day →