Topic
Scientific Consensus Replication
24 items
· 5 aliases
· first seen 23 May 2026
The post critiques the credibility of climate change data and the Greens party, portraying scientific models and policy recommendations as outdated, financially wasteful, and ideologically driven.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
24 social posts
·
193 engagement
Stance — 24 classified edges
Supportive
6
Critical
17
Neutral / explainer
1
Sentiment — 24 classified posts
Positive
6
Neutral
4
Negative
14
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
facebook
· 1newsnz
· sentiment: neutral
· ♥ 50
· ↻ 2
· 💬 20
· 114 engagement
3 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCZkb7n2LIPsfE17cgO0Y4aQ
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 33
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 33 engagement
12 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCdqn6DqR5YYb_xATo3zm9Ew
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 13
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 13 engagement
29 Apr
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.