Topic
Political Inclusivity
19 items
· 7 aliases
· first seen 11 May 2026
The post critically examines the meaning and implications of 'They are us' rhetoric in immigration discourse, arguing it reflects eliminationist thinking and justifies police harassment of critics.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
16 social posts
·
127 engagement
Stance — 16 classified edges
Supportive
4
Critical
8
Neutral / explainer
2
Mocking
2
Sentiment — 16 classified posts
Positive
1
Negative
15
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
youtube
· @reality-check-radio-nz
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 33
· ↻ 0
· 💬 4
· 45 engagement
10 May
-
youtube
· @UC03LthIgql_oxovFwGxA5jA
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 33
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 33 engagement
4 Jun
-
youtube
· @UCH6kACyiciEGgr1JQp4qduw
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 30
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 30 engagement
17 Jun
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.