Topic
Incitement To Harm
3 items
· 2 aliases
· first seen 9 May 2026
The post discusses the tension between free speech and legal restrictions on incitement to harm under New Zealand law, using a reference to a specific criminal offence.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
3 social posts
·
65 engagement
Stance — 3 classified edges
Supportive
1
Critical
2
Sentiment — 3 classified posts
Positive
1
Negative
2
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
twitter
· @josephmooneymp
· sentiment: positive
· ♥ 11
· ↻ 1
· 💬 17
· 64 engagement
9 May
-
youtube
· @UCPmKt0yqvPJr7f7DHSiwtNA
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 1
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 1 engagement
8 May
-
twitter
· @josephmooneymp
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 0
· ↻ 0
· 💬 0
· 0 engagement
9 May
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.