Topic
Healthcare Bill Scrutiny
6 items
· 3 aliases
· first seen 8 May 2026
The post criticizes a political figure for lacking substantive understanding of a healthcare bill, accusing them of relying on superficial arguments rather than informed analysis.
Volume by source orientation Methodology →
Stacked weekly counts; colour by lean. “n/a” covers government and iwi-Māori sources where lean isn't applicable.
Alias drift
How this topic has been named, week by week. A new alias winning out is usually a framing shift.
Free account
Watch this topic with a free account — get alerted when framing shifts, when an MP adopts new language, or when discourse and press diverge.
Create a free account
Log in
Sample framings
Up to 12 framings spread across orientations.
Each framing is a short phrase the topic extractor generated to characterise the piece's stance —
not a quote from the source. Click through to read the original.
No framings recorded for this topic yet.
How the public reacted
Social-media signal on the same topic, drawn from
the social lens. Engagement is
likes + 2×shares + 3×replies, the same weighting used
across the digest cards.
View on /social →
5 social posts
·
359 engagement
Stance — 5 classified edges
Critical
4
Neutral / explainer
1
Sentiment — 5 classified posts
Neutral
1
Negative
4
Most-engaged posts on this topic
-
twitter
· @_chloeswarbrick
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 74
· ↻ 9
· 💬 16
· 140 engagement
22 Jul
-
twitter
· @dbseymour
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 63
· ↻ 5
· 💬 21
· 136 engagement
30 Jun
-
twitter
· @nzgreens
· sentiment: negative
· ♥ 35
· ↻ 9
· 💬 6
· 71 engagement
13 Nov
Spotted something wrong on this page?
Report a correction.